Heatherly v. Heatherly
This text of 489 So. 2d 877 (Heatherly v. Heatherly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although we affirm the requirement that the husband pay the debts to Broward General Hospital and to Atlantic Ambulance Services, because they were pled and prayed for in the petition, the Final Judgment was in error in requiring the husband to pay any of the remaining debts since relief as to those debts was neither requested nor prayed for.
Accordingly, this cause is affirmed in all respects except for the provision of the Final Judgment requiring the husband to pay “all of the marital debts presently existing.”
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 So. 2d 877, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1321, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heatherly-v-heatherly-fladistctapp-1986.