Heather Hagedorn v. Eric Hagedorn
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00364-CV ___________________________
HEATHER HAGEDORN, Appellant
V.
ERIC HAGEDORN, Appellee
On Appeal from the 322nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 322-676223-20
Before Bassel, Womack, Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on January 17, 2023. On January 30, 2023, we
notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief
and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and
why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We
have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: March 2, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heather Hagedorn v. Eric Hagedorn (Heather Hagedorn v. Eric Hagedorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.