Heathcotte v. Landwehr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Heathcotte v. Landwehr

266 S.W.3d 345, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. No. ED 90515·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Margaret Heathcotte (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s calculation of interest rates on payments due to her from Ronald Landwehr (“Husband”), and also the trial court’s failure to award her sufficient attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Margaret Heathcotte (‘Wife”) appeals the trial court’s calculation of interest rates on payments due to her from Ronald Landwehr (“Husband”), and also the trial court’s failure to award her sufficient attorney’s fees. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Heathcotte v. Landwehr, 266 S.W.3d 345, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

266 S.W.3d 345 (Heathcotte v. Landwehr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.