Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal

E.D. Arkansas

Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal

DecidedMay 9, 2023

Docket2:22-cv-00217

StatusUnknown

This text of Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal (Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal, (E.D. Ark. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION

DEBBIE HEATHCOCK, Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Heathcock PLAINTIFF

V. No. 2:22-cv-217-DPM

SPEED INTERMODAL; SRIKANTH VANGALA; FREEDOM 1, LLC; RYDER SYSTEM, INC.; DESHUN DEAN; HERITAGE TRANSPORT, LLC; JOSH JOHNSON; RIATA TRUCKING LLC; CARLOS MARTINEZ; GLOBE TRANSPORTATION, INC, MUTHANNA ALZAIDY; A&S BROTHERS, INC; and JASPREET SINGH DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Robert Heathcock died after several large trucks collided with his vehicle. The representative of his estate brings several claims against the trucking companies and drivers involved in the accident. Heritage Transport, Josh Johnson, Speed Intermodal, and Srikanth Vangala move to dismiss the negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and negligence per se claims against them. Doc. 23 & 32. Heathcock has not responded to those motions. Heathcock also moves for default judgment against Riata Trucking. Doc. 31.

2. The partial motions to dismiss, Doc. 23 & 32, are granted. Because Heritage Transport and Speed Intermodal have conceded vicarious liability for any negligent acts of their drivers, Heathcock can’t bring a claim for negligent hiring, supervision, or training. Elrod v. G & R Construction Co., 275 Ark. 151, 154, 628 S.W.2d 17, 18-19 (1982). And a violation of the law doesn’t constitute negligence per se in Arkansas. Young v. Dodson, 239 Ark. 143, 388 S.W.2d 94, 98 (1965). Heathcock’s claims for negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and negligence per se against Heritage Transport, Josh Johnson, Speed Intermodal, and Srikanth Vangala are dismissed without prejudice. 3. | Heathcock’s motion for default judgment, Doc. 31, is denied without prejudice. Riata Trucking has not appeared in the case. But Heathcock did not seek a Clerk’s default against Riata Trucking before moving for a default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998). So Ordered. eb ap D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 4 May 2023

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION

DEBBIE HEATHCOCK, Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Heathcock PLAINTIFF

V. No. 2:22-cv-217-DPM

SPEED INTERMODAL; SRIKANTH VANGALA; FREEDOM 1, LLC; RYDER SYSTEM, INC.; DESHUN DEAN; HERITAGE TRANSPORT, LLC; JOSH JOHNSON; RIATA TRUCKING LLC; CARLOS MARTINEZ; GLOBE TRANSPORTATION, INC, MUTHANNA ALZAIDY; A&S BROTHERS, INC; and JASPREET SINGH DEFENDANTS

ORDER 1. Robert Heathcock died after several large trucks collided with his vehicle. The representative of his estate brings several claims against the trucking companies and drivers involved in the accident. Heritage Transport, Josh Johnson, Speed Intermodal, and Srikanth Vangala move to dismiss the negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and negligence per se claims against them. Doc. 23 & 32. Heathcock has not responded to those motions. Heathcock also moves for default judgment against Riata Trucking. Doc. 31.

2. The partial motions to dismiss, Doc. 23 & 32, are granted. Because Heritage Transport and Speed Intermodal have conceded vicarious liability for any negligent acts of their drivers, Heathcock can’t bring a claim for negligent hiring, supervision, or training. Elrod v. G & R Construction Co., 275 Ark. 151, 154, 628 S.W.2d 17, 18-19 (1982). And a violation of the law doesn’t constitute negligence per se in Arkansas. Young v. Dodson, 239 Ark. 143, 388 S.W.2d 94, 98 (1965). Heathcock’s claims for negligent hiring, negligent entrustment, and negligence per se against Heritage Transport, Josh Johnson, Speed Intermodal, and Srikanth Vangala are dismissed without prejudice. 3. | Heathcock’s motion for default judgment, Doc. 31, is denied without prejudice. Riata Trucking has not appeared in the case. But Heathcock did not seek a Clerk’s default against Riata Trucking before moving for a default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998). So Ordered. eb ap D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge 4 May 2023

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Heathcock v. Speed Intermodal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heathcock-v-speed-intermodal-ared-2023.

Opinion

V. No. 2:22-cv-217-DPM

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack