Heath v. Teter

Montana Supreme Court

Heath v. Teter

288 P.2d 361, 129 Mont. 608, 1955 Mont. LEXIS 61

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 3, 1955

DocketNo. 9542

StatusPublished

This text of 288 P.2d 361 (Heath v. Teter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heath v. Teter, 288 P.2d 361, 129 Mont. 608, 1955 Mont. LEXIS 61 (Mo. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing by written stipulation this day filed in the office of the clerk of this court that the appellants Caleb C. Heath and Viola J. Heath, by and through their attorneys of record Nutter & Hebert, Sidney, and Leif Erickson, Helena, [609]*609and the respondents C. R. Teter, ¥m. M. Hanlon and Rouene Hanlon, by and through their attorneys Leavitt & Lucas, Miles City, and F. F. Haynes, Forsyth, have stipulated and agreed that the appeal now pending before this court in the above entitled and numbered cause may be dismissed and that the appellants and the respondents pay their own costs.

Now therefore it is ordered that said appeal be and it is hereby dismissed and that appellants pay appellants’ costs and that respondents pay respondents’ costs herein.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR and MR. JUSTICES ANDERSON, DAYIS and BOTTOMLY concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It appearing by written stipulation this day filed in the office of the clerk of this court that the appellants Caleb C. Heath and Viola J. Heath, by and through their attorneys of record Nutter & Hebert, Sidney, and Leif Erickson, Helena, [609]*609and the respondents C. R. Teter, ¥m. M. Hanlon and Rouene Hanlon, by and through their attorneys Leavitt & Lucas, Miles City, and F. F. Haynes, Forsyth, have stipulated and agreed that the appeal now pending before this court in the above entitled and numbered cause may be dismissed and that the appellants and the respondents pay their own costs.

Now therefore it is ordered that said appeal be and it is hereby dismissed and that appellants pay appellants’ costs and that respondents pay respondents’ costs herein.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR and MR. JUSTICES ANDERSON, DAYIS and BOTTOMLY concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 P.2d 361, 129 Mont. 608, 1955 Mont. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-teter-mont-1955.