Heath v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Heath v. State

924 So. 2d 987, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5312, 2006 WL 931750

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 12, 2006

DocketNo. 2D05-4514

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 924 So. 2d 987 (Heath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heath v. State, 924 So. 2d 987, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5312, 2006 WL 931750 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

LaROSE, Judge.

Joseph L. Heath appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

A jury convicted Mr. Heath of battery on a law enforcement officer and obstructing an officer with violence. He was sentenced as a violent career criminal to fifteen years in prison, with a ten-year mandatory minimum, for the obstruction charge. He received a consecutive five-year prison term for the battery charge. Mr. Heath argues that the sentences are illegal because the charges arise from a single criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521, 524-25 (Fla.1993). The State agrees and concedes that Mr. Heath should be resentenced in accordance with Rodriguez v. State, 883 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), and Kiedrowski v. State, 876 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Accordingly, we reverse the post-conviction court’s order summarily denying Mr. Heath’s rule 3.800(a) motion and remand for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LaROSE, Judge.

Joseph L. Heath appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for resentencing.

A jury convicted Mr. Heath of battery on a law enforcement officer and obstructing an officer with violence. He was sentenced as a violent career criminal to fifteen years in prison, with a ten-year mandatory minimum, for the obstruction charge. He received a consecutive five-year prison term for the battery charge. Mr. Heath argues that the sentences are illegal because the charges arise from a single criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521, 524-25 (Fla.1993). The State agrees and concedes that Mr. Heath should be resentenced in accordance with Rodriguez v. State, 883 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), and Kiedrowski v. State, 876 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Accordingly, we reverse the post-conviction court’s order summarily denying Mr. Heath’s rule 3.800(a) motion and remand for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

ALTENBERND and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

924 So. 2d 987, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5312, 2006 WL 931750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack