Heath v. State
804 So. 2d 550, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 207, 2002 WL 54501
This text of 804 So. 2d 550 (Heath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heath v. State, 804 So. 2d 550, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 207, 2002 WL 54501 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Affirmed. Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). As in Major we certify the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
804 So. 2d 550, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 207, 2002 WL 54501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.