Heath v. State
804 So. 2d 550, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 207, 2002 WL 54501
Opinion
Affirmed. Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). As in Major we certify the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heath v. State, 804 So. 2d 550, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 207, 2002 WL 54501 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
804 So. 2d 550 (Heath v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)