Heath v. State
This text of 426 So. 2d 1106 (Heath v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s concession at the charge conference that the offense for which he was convicted was a lesser-included offense of the offense charged waived his right to assert on appeal that the jury should not have been instructed on the lesser-included offense, and his objection on the completely separate and totally unmeritorious ground that the trial court is not empowered to instruct on any lesser-included offenses unless requested by the defendant hardly preserves the point for our review. State v. Washington, 268 So.2d 901 (Fla.1972); Courson v. State, 414 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 So. 2d 1106, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.