Heath v. Shurling
115 S.E. 35, 29 Ga. App. 258, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 217
This text of 115 S.E. 35 (Heath v. Shurling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heath v. Shurling, 115 S.E. 35, 29 Ga. App. 258, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 217 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
In view of the counter-showing made to the motion for a continuance in this case, this court cannot say that there was an abuse of legal discretion in overruling such motion, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 S.E. 35, 29 Ga. App. 258, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-shurling-gactapp-1922.