Heath v. Maddock

94 A. 218, 83 N.J. Eq. 681, 13 Buchanan 681, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 16, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 94 A. 218 (Heath v. Maddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heath v. Maddock, 94 A. 218, 83 N.J. Eq. 681, 13 Buchanan 681, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410 (N.J. 1914).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.

For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henney v. Ertl
71 A.2d 546 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Phraner v. Stone
44 A.2d 504 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In Re Fidelity Union Title, C., Co.
41 A.2d 392 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In re proceedings under the Mortgage Guaranty Corporations' Rehabilitation Act
136 N.J. Eq. 294 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Lockwood v. Clarke
41 A.2d 37 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Parker v. Wright
143 A. 870 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Tichenor v. Mech. Metals Nat. Bk. of N.Y.
125 A. 323 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A. 218, 83 N.J. Eq. 681, 13 Buchanan 681, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-maddock-nj-1914.