Heath v. Maddock
94 A. 218, 83 N.J. Eq. 681, 13 Buchanan 681, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Magie.
For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenbuegh, Williams — 7.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Heppenheimer — 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heath v. Maddock, 94 A. 218, 83 N.J. Eq. 681, 13 Buchanan 681, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 410 (N.J. 1914).
94 A. 218 (Heath v. Maddock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henney v. Ertl
71 A.2d 546 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Phraner v. Stone
44 A.2d 504 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In Re Fidelity Union Title, C., Co.
41 A.2d 392 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
In re proceedings under the Mortgage Guaranty Corporations' Rehabilitation Act
136 N.J. Eq. 294 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Lockwood v. Clarke
41 A.2d 37 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Parker v. Wright
143 A. 870 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Tichenor v. Mech. Metals Nat. Bk. of N.Y.
125 A. 323 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)