Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Heath v. Maddock

Heath v. Maddock

91 A. 1069, 82 N.J. Eq. 366, 12 Buchanan 366, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 371
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 17, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 A. 1069 (Heath v. Maddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heath v. Maddock, 91 A. 1069, 82 N.J. Eq. 366, 12 Buchanan 366, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 371 (N.J. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons 'stated in-the opinion filed in the court below by the ordinary.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13. ■ ■ • For reversal—-None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin v. Millard
395 A.2d 1267 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Bartel v. Clarenbach
274 A.2d 841 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Clark v. State Bar
246 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A. 1069, 82 N.J. Eq. 366, 12 Buchanan 366, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-maddock-nj-1913.