Heath v. Forbes
This text of 11 N.Y.S. 87 (Heath v. Forbes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The clerk properly refused to tax the defendant’s costs. See Cooper v. Jolly, 30 Hun, 224, affirmed, 96 N. Y. 667; Briggs v. Allen, 4 Hill, 538; Williard v. Strachan, 3 Civil Proc. R. 452; Crosley v. Cobb, 42 Hun, 167; Reed v. Batten, 6 N. Y. Supp. 708,—which must prevail against the case reported in 41 Hun, 249, (Blashfield v. Blashfield.) The rule as settled seems to be that to entitle a defendant to costs in a case where he succeeds as to one of several causes of action, nothing short of a specific verdict in his favor as to such cause of action will suffice. Action of clerk affirmed. See Durant v. Abendroth, 13 Civil Proc. R. 434.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.Y.S. 87, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-forbes-nynyccityct-1890.