Heath v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Heath v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance

77 A. 1133, 106 Me. 560, 1910 Me. LEXIS 43

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 18, 1910·Published

Opinion

Assumpsit brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the' sum of $1300 and interest upon a policy of insurance issued to Robert S. Brown and payable in case of loss to the plaintiff, as her mortgage interest may appear. The special matter of defense set up was that Brown represented and warranted in his application that there was no other insurance upon the premises that the warranty was in fact untrue. Verdict for plaintiff for $1384.50. Defendant moved for a new trial. Only two questions were raised, namely, the validity of the policy and the amount of the damages. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant the' sum of $1300 and interest upon a policy of insurance issued to Robert S. Brown and payable in case of loss to the plaintiff, as her mortgage interest may appear. The special matter of defense set up was that Brown represented and warranted in his application that there was no other insurance upon the premises that the warranty was in fact untrue. Verdict for plaintiff for $1384.50. Defendant moved for a new trial. Only two questions were raised, namely, the validity of the policy and the amount of the damages. Motion overruled.

Heath v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance, 77 A. 1133, 106 Me. 560, 1910 Me. LEXIS 43 (Me. 1910).

Pincite

77 A. 1133 (Heath v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.