Heath v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Heath v. City of Chicago

186 Ill. App. 65

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 21, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,321

StatusPublished

This text of 186 Ill. App. 65 (Heath v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heath v. City of Chicago, 186 Ill. App. 65 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Damages, § 110*—when verdict for pergonal injuries not excessive. A verdict of $5,950 for personal injuries held not excessive, it appearing that the plaintiffs hip was broken and the femur fractured and there was evidence tending to show that the injuries will be permanent and that she will never be able to walk without the aid of crutches. 4. Appeal and ebbob, § 1561*-—when refusal of requested instructions not error. Refusal of requested instruction covered by other instructions held not error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Damages, § 110*—when verdict for pergonal injuries not excessive. A verdict of $5,950 for personal injuries held not excessive, it appearing that the plaintiffs hip was broken and the femur fractured and there was evidence tending to show that the injuries will be permanent and that she will never be able to walk without the aid of crutches. 4. Appeal and ebbob, § 1561*-—when refusal of requested instructions not error. Refusal of requested instruction covered by other instructions held not error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 Ill. App. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-city-of-chicago-illappct-1914.