Heath v. . Bishop

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Heath v. . Bishop

72 N.C. 456

DecidedJanuary 5, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.C. 456 (Heath v. . Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heath v. . Bishop, 72 N.C. 456 (N.C. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Reade, J.

In Perry v. Tupper, 70 N. C. Rep., 538, and in the same case, 71 N. C. Rep., 380 and 383, it was decided that a party put out of the possession of land by an abuse of the process of law, is entitled to a writ of restitution as a matter of course, unless some new matter has intervened in the meantime. And that is decisive of this case.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Pee Oueiam. J udgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reade, J.

In Perry v. Tupper, 70 N. C. Rep., 538, and in the same case, 71 N. C. Rep., 380 and 383, it was decided that a party put out of the possession of land by an abuse of the process of law, is entitled to a writ of restitution as a matter of course, unless some new matter has intervened in the meantime. And that is decisive of this case.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Pee Oueiam. J udgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 N.C. 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-bishop-nc-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack