Heaston v. Fulghum

7 Blackf. 101
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 1844·Published

Opinion

IN an action against three persons founded on contract, a judgment against two of them only is erroneous, unless there be a return of u not found ” as to the other, and a suggestion of the return entered of record. See Lowe et al. v. Blair et al., 6 Blackf. 282.—Depew v. Wheelan et al. Id. 485.—Bell v. The State, Ante, 33.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heaston v. Fulghum, 7 Blackf. 101 (Ind. 1844).

7 Blackf. 101 (Heaston v. Fulghum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. Blair
6 Blackf. 282 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1842)