Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc.

9 A.D.3d 874, 779 N.Y.S.2d 392, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 A.D.3d 870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2004·No. Appeal No. 3·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered May 21, 2003. The order denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict dismissing the cause of action for breach of contract.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v Intertek Testing Servs. ([appeal No. 1] 9 AD3d 870 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc., 9 A.D.3d 874, 779 N.Y.S.2d 392, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

9 A.D.3d 874 (Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heary Bros. Lightning Protection Co. v. Intertek Testing Services, N.A., Inc.
9 A.D.3d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)