Heartland Express, Inc. v. Torres
This text of 89 So. 3d 1074 (Heartland Express, Inc. v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Hernando County v. Leisure Hills, Inc., 648 So.2d 257 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (determining that order reserving jurisdiction to determine damages is non-final); Amendments to Fla. R. App. P., 780 So.2d 834 (Fla.2000) (repealing former rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), which allowed interlocutory review of orders determining liability in favor of a party seeking affirmative relief); see also Demont v. Demont, 24 So.3d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal rather than allowing lower court to enter a final order where an indeterminate amount of judicial labor remained to be done before a final order could be entered).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 So. 3d 1074, 2012 WL 2244313, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heartland-express-inc-v-torres-fladistctapp-2012.