Hearst v. Redder

New York Supreme Court

Hearst v. Redder

71 Misc. 18, 129 N.Y.S. 1098

DecidedFebruary 15, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 71 Misc. 18 (Hearst v. Redder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hearst v. Redder, 71 Misc. 18, 129 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Greenbaum, J.

The questions raised by the demurrers to the various defenses in this action are, except as to the fifth defense to each of the three causes of action alleged, similar to those discussed in the opinion in Hearst v. New Yorker Staats Zeitung (ante, p. 7). In this defense; which is pleaded in mitigation of damages, it is alleged [19]*19“ that the defendant had no notice or knowledge that the publication complained of was false, and it was published without malice and in the belief and with reasonable cause to believe that the same and each and every part thereof was true.” I am of opinion that the naked allegation of the belief in the truth of a libelous charge, unsupported by the statement of a single fact or circumstance upon which such belief is based, is insufficient to constitute a defense in mitigation of damages, and that the demurrers to these defenses should accordingly be sustained.

Demurrers sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greenbaum, J.

The questions raised by the demurrers to the various defenses in this action are, except as to the fifth defense to each of the three causes of action alleged, similar to those discussed in the opinion in Hearst v. New Yorker Staats Zeitung (ante, p. 7). In this defense; which is pleaded in mitigation of damages, it is alleged [19]*19“ that the defendant had no notice or knowledge that the publication complained of was false, and it was published without malice and in the belief and with reasonable cause to believe that the same and each and every part thereof was true.” I am of opinion that the naked allegation of the belief in the truth of a libelous charge, unsupported by the statement of a single fact or circumstance upon which such belief is based, is insufficient to constitute a defense in mitigation of damages, and that the demurrers to these defenses should accordingly be sustained.

Demurrers sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Misc. 18, 129 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hearst-v-redder-nysupct-1911.