Hearne v. Lewis

14 S.W. 572, 78 Tex. 276, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1385
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 21, 1890
DocketNo. 6658
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 14 S.W. 572 (Hearne v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hearne v. Lewis, 14 S.W. 572, 78 Tex. 276, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1385 (Tex. 1890).

Opinion

ACKEB, Presiding Judge.

In December, 1886, H. B. Hearne, as administrator of the Carr estate, leased a farm belonging to said estate to H. L. Lewis for the year 1887, and took his note for the rent, with Adeline M. Lewis as surety, payable on the 1st day of November, 1887.

On the 12th day of May, 1887, Adeline M. Lewis purchased the farm, and the title thereto was vested in her by decree of the Probate Court, nothing being said at the time about the rent for the year 1887.

This suit was brought by the administrator to enforce payment of the note given for the rent. II. L. Lewis answered, admitting his liability on the note, and that Adeline M. Lewis claimed that she was entitled to the rent money due on the note, and asked that the court determine who he should pay the money to.

Adeline M. Lewis answered, setting up her claim to the rent by virtue of her purchase of the land before the rent became due.

The trial without a jury resulted in judgment for defendants as against the plaintiff, and in favor of Adeline M. Lewis against H. L. Lewis for the amount of the note sued on. The plaintiff appealed.

The question of controlling importance, and the only one we deem it necessary to consider, is, Did the rent not due pass to Adeline M. Lewis with her purchase of the fee?

In the case of Porter v. Sweeney, 61 Texas, 216, it is said: The general rule is that even an apportionment of rent is never made under the [278]*278common law in reference to length of time of occupation, but whoever owns the reversion at the time the rent falls due is entitled to the entire sum then due.”

No reservation of the rent having been made at the time Adeline M. Lewis acquired title to the land, the general rule applies, and she being owner of the fee at the time the rent became due was the owner also of the rent.

We are of opinion that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Adopted October 21, 1890.

Justice Henry not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dearborn Stove Co. v. Caples
236 S.W.2d 486 (Texas Supreme Court, 1951)
Abilene Hotel Corporation v. Gill
187 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)
Lindley Trust v. Commissioner
42 B.T.A. 509 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Clarkson Lindley Trust v. Commissioner
42 B.T.A. 509 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Faircloth v. Flewellen
130 S.W.2d 1098 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Carpenter v. Shaw
280 U.S. 363 (Supreme Court, 1930)
Hensley v. Hill
1928 OK 458 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Rives v. James
3 S.W.2d 932 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Caruthers v. Leonard
254 S.W. 779 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1923)
Leonard v. Caruthers
236 S.W. 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Roberts v. Armstrong
212 S.W. 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Williams v. King
206 S.W. 106 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Evans v. First Guaranty State Bank of Southmayd
195 S.W. 1171 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Armstrong v. Gifford
196 S.W. 723 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
J. B. Farthing Lumber Co. v. Williams
194 S.W. 453 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Wald v. Bien
14 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 145 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1913)
Lester v. Zink
154 S.W. 1161 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Osborne v. Osborne
138 S.W. 1062 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Vogel v. Zuercher
135 S.W. 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.W. 572, 78 Tex. 276, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hearne-v-lewis-tex-1890.