Hearne v. Conklin

Nevada Supreme Court

Hearne v. Conklin

429 P.3d 1254

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 16, 2018

DocketNo. 76274

StatusPublished

This text of 429 P.3d 1254 (Hearne v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hearne v. Conklin, 429 P.3d 1254 (Neb. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an appeal from an order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K. Simons, Judge.

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final judgment. Appellants have not opposed the motion.¹ Having considered the motion we grant it. An order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement is not a final judgment where it does not enter judgment in favor of a party or otherwise resolve the pending claims. See Brown v. WIC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 301 P.3d 850 (2013) ; Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 733 (1994) (concluding that a district court order approving a settlement agreement was interlocutory). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.²

Appellants have also failed to respond to our order entered October 4, 2018, granting in part appellants' motion for an extension of time to retain new counsel.

We deny as moot appellant's motion for stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an appeal from an order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K. Simons, Judge.

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final judgment. Appellants have not opposed the motion.¹ Having considered the motion we grant it. An order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement is not a final judgment where it does not enter judgment in favor of a party or otherwise resolve the pending claims. See Brown v. WIC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 301 P.3d 850 (2013) ; Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 733 (1994) (concluding that a district court order approving a settlement agreement was interlocutory). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.²

Appellants have also failed to respond to our order entered October 4, 2018, granting in part appellants' motion for an extension of time to retain new counsel.

We deny as moot appellant's motion for stay.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 P.3d 1254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hearne-v-conklin-nev-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack