Hearn v. City of Jackson
This text of Hearn v. City of Jackson (Hearn v. City of Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the October 14, 2004 United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III for the Fifth Circuit Clerk _______________
m 03-60884 _______________
DERIC HEARN; ALVALINE BAGGETT; CHARLES BANKS; JERRY BRISTER; TOMMIE L. BROWN; JANE DOES 1-50; JOHN DOES; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi m 3-99-CV-359-LN _________________________
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, issued a comprehensive opinion, entered Circuit Judges. August 12, 2003, dismissing the complaint.
PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed the briefs and applicable portions of the record and have consulted the The plaintiffs bring a title VII action for relevant caselaw. Concluding that the district disparate treatment and disparate impact. court committed no reversible error, we af- Following a bench trial, the district court firm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court in its impressive opinion.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de- termined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hearn v. City of Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hearn-v-city-of-jackson-ca5-2004.