Heard v. Wynn

22 La. Ann. 469
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1870
DocketNo. 93
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 La. Ann. 469 (Heard v. Wynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heard v. Wynn, 22 La. Ann. 469 (La. 1870).

Opinion

Wyly, J.

The defendant, who appeals from a judgment against him, on a promissory note, contends that his obligation is extinguished by the prescription of five years, more than that period having-elapsed from the maturity of the note to the institution of this suit. The plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that there was an interruption of prescription, and the evidence adduced by him satisfies us' of the fact.

We find, however, there is error in the judgment as to the date at which interest should begin to run, the judge decreeing- interest from the first of January, 1861, whereas the note stipulates it only from the first of March, 1861.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment be amended allowing eight per cent, per annum interest only from the first of March, 1861, and as thus amended that it be affirmed. It is further ordered that plaintiff pay costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interstate Electric Co. v. Neugas
3 La. App. 353 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 La. Ann. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heard-v-wynn-la-1870.