Heard v. State

663 So. 2d 971, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081, 1993 WL 333602
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 3, 1993·No. CR-91-1682·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON SECOND RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Larry Heard, appealed the partial denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that the trial court could correct its order to state that the entire petition was denied. Heard v. State, 663 So.2d 967 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). We remanded the cause a second time after the trial court failed to comply with our directions. Heard v. State, 663 So.2d 970 (Ala.Cr.App.1993).

The trial court has now filed a return to remand complying with our directions. The petition has been denied in all aspects. The judgment of the circuit court is now due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heard v. State, 663 So. 2d 971, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1081, 1993 WL 333602 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

663 So. 2d 971 (Heard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heard v. State
663 So. 2d 973 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Heard v. State
663 So. 2d 971 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)