Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7817
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 8, 1996
DocketNo. CV95 0149551 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7817 (Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7817 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant's motion to dismiss (#102) is granted. The complaint was not timely served and was not timely returned to court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-46 and 52-46a. "This statute is mandatory and failure to comply with its requirements as to the time when process shall be served renders the proceeding voidable and subject to abatement." Rogozinski v.American Food Service Equip. Corp., 211 Conn. 431, 433,559 A.2d 1110 (1989). Voidable means voidable at the defendant's instance.Bergin v. Bergin, 3 Conn. App. 566, 569, 490 A.2d 543 (1985). The defendant has not waived the defect. Accordingly, the motion is granted.

RYAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogozinski v. American Food Service Equipment Corp.
559 A.2d 1110 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)
Bergin v. Bergin
490 A.2d 543 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heard-v-montanez-no-cv95-0149551-s-oct-8-1996-connsuperct-1996.