Heard v. District of Columbia
179 A.2d 723, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 350
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of disorderly conduct1 and drinking in public.2 He contends here that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. The record convinces us that appellant’s contention is without merit.
Affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heard v. District of Columbia, 179 A.2d 723, 1962 D.C. App. LEXIS 350 (D.C. 1962).
179 A.2d 723 (Heard v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.