Heard v. DeLoach

30 S.E. 940, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 624
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1898·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. The title to promissory notes payable to a named person or order, and by him indorsed in blank, passes to any holder to whom the notes are delivered in pursuance of such indorsement.

2. The defense of failure of consideration set up in resistance to an action upon promissory notes can not.be established without proving what was the consideration thereof.

3. While there was in the present case testimony tending to show the worthlessness of a patented article known as a “ kitchen cabinet,'’ for the right to sell which in a designated county the answer of the defendants alleged that the notes in suit were given, there was no evidence whatever to show that the same were in fact given for the purchase of any such right.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heard v. DeLoach, 30 S.E. 940, 105 Ga. 500, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 624 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 940 (Heard v. DeLoach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Bondholders Corp. v. Cheeseman
8 S.E.2d 391 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Jones v. Lawman
194 S.E. 416 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Blackwell v. Grant
167 S.E. 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Brantley v. Merchants & Farmers Bank
97 S.E. 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Stiles v. Shedden
58 S.E. 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Andrews v. John Church Co.
58 S.E. 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)