Heap v. Greene
This text of 75 F. 405 (Heap v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a bill in equity to enjoin an alleged infringement of the first claim of letters patent No. 377,-151, issued January 31, 1888, to Henry Nicolas Grosselin, fils, for machine for napping cloth. The claim is as follows:
(1) In a gig mill, the combination, with a rotary drum consisting of heads, a shaft, and a series of card or teaseling rollers journaled upon said heads, and provided with pulleys at their projecting ends, of a driving belt applied to each set of said pulleys, and devices, substantially as described, for driving said belts with varying speeds, and in different directions, as described, whereby the cards are rotated simultaneously each about its own axis and about the axis of the drum, substantially as described.
The defense is stated under several heads, but they seem to reduce themselves to two only, namely, invalidity of the patent, and non-infringement. On the first defense I shall express no opinion. On the second defense, that the respondents do not infringe, I find myself unable, without the use of drawings which are not here available, to state the differences of structure and function in the several machines under consideration in such a way as to be probably useful; and I therefore must content myself with the statement of my conclusion that the patent is so limited by the prior art and especially by the English patent to William Davis (No. 4,820), of July 24, 1823, and by the German patent to Moritz Jahr (No. 4,949),' of September 1, 1878, that it must be confined to the specific methods used to produce the main result which is the general function of the patented machine, and hence that the respondents do not infringe. The bill will be dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F. 405, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heap-v-greene-circtdma-1896.