Heaney v. Heaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heaney v. Heaney

69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 A.D.2d 897 (Heaney v. Heaney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heaney v. Heaney, 69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the plaintiff wife to enforce the provisions of a separation agreement which, inter alia, relate to the defendant husband’s obligation to provide a college education for one of the children of the marriage, defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 8, 1978, as awarded plaintiff a counsel fee in the sum of $7,500. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the counsel fee awarded to plaintiff in the fourth decretal paragraph thereof to $3,000. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The counsel fee awarded was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur. [93 Mise 2d 811.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the plaintiff wife to enforce the provisions of a separation agreement which, inter alia, relate to the defendant husband’s obligation to provide a college education for one of the children of the marriage, defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 8, 1978, as awarded plaintiff a counsel fee in the sum of $7,500. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the counsel fee awarded to plaintiff in the fourth decretal paragraph thereof to $3,000. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The counsel fee awarded was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Mangano, JJ., concur. [93 Mise 2d 811.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heaney-v-heaney-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack