Healy v. Ward Baking Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Healy v. Ward Baking Co.

4 R.I. Dec. 160

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJune 6, 1928

DocketNo. 70052

StatusPublished

This text of 4 R.I. Dec. 160 (Healy v. Ward Baking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Healy v. Ward Baking Co., 4 R.I. Dec. 160 (R.I. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

WAUSH, J.

This is the suit of a husband to recover for the expenses he has incurred by reason of injuries to his wife, due, as he claims, to the negligence of defendant’s servant in the operation .of defendant’s truck. It is a companion case to Bridget Healy vs. Ward Baking Co. The question of liability is disposed of in the Bridget Healy case.

The total damage proved by the husband is $132. If the husband shall remit all of the verdict in excess of one hundred thirty-two dollars within ten days of the date of this rescript, defendant’s motion for a new trial is denied, otherwise it is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WAUSH, J.

This is the suit of a husband to recover for the expenses he has incurred by reason of injuries to his wife, due, as he claims, to the negligence of defendant’s servant in the operation .of defendant’s truck. It is a companion case to Bridget Healy vs. Ward Baking Co. The question of liability is disposed of in the Bridget Healy case.

The total damage proved by the husband is $132. If the husband shall remit all of the verdict in excess of one hundred thirty-two dollars within ten days of the date of this rescript, defendant’s motion for a new trial is denied, otherwise it is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 R.I. Dec. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-ward-baking-co-risuperct-1928.