Healy v. Ratta

289 U.S. 701, 53 S. Ct. 522
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 20, 1933
DocketNo. 669
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 289 U.S. 701 (Healy v. Ratta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Healy v. Ratta, 289 U.S. 701, 53 S. Ct. 522 (1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 U.S. 701, 53 S. Ct. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-ratta-scotus-1933.