Healy v. Medlock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Healy v. Medlock

861 So. 2d 400, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 127, 2003 WL 1950001

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 25, 2003

Docket1020282

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 So. 2d 400 (Healy v. Medlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Healy v. Medlock, 861 So. 2d 400, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 127, 2003 WL 1950001 (Ala. 2003).

Pincite

Opinions

MOORE, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the Healys’ petition, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving or disapproving the holding by the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that the Healys’ “procedural default” in pursuing their claim against the estate of the underinsured motorist “prevented the Healys’ recovery” against the underin-sured-motorist insurance carrier itself. See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Griffin, 51 Ala.App. 426, 286 So.2d 302 (1973); and State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Lambert, 291 Ala. 645, 285 So.2d 917 (1973). In petitioning this Court, the Healys did not seek review of the holding in favor of the underinsured-motorist insurance carrier.

WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, Chief Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. In denying the Healys’ petition, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving or disapproving the holding by the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that the Healys’ “procedural default” in pursuing their claim against the estate of the underinsured motorist “prevented the Healys’ recovery” against the underin-sured-motorist insurance carrier itself. See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Griffin, 51 Ala.App. 426, 286 So.2d 302 (1973); and State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Lambert, 291 Ala. 645, 285 So.2d 917 (1973). In petitioning this Court, the Healys did not seek review of the holding in favor of the underinsured-motorist insurance carrier.

WRIT DENIED.

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

861 So. 2d 400, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 127, 2003 WL 1950001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-medlock-ala-2003.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack