Healy v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.
This text of 80 F. App'x 597 (Healy v. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
EDS brings this consolidated appeal and petition for writ of mandamus to challenge a sua sponte remand by the Eastern District of California. The underlying case involves breach of an employment separation agreement. In July 2002, EDS sought removal to federal court on diversity grounds. Upon finding that not all defendants had joined in the notice of removal as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b), the district court issued a sua sponte remand to Sacramento Superior Court.
Our recent opinion in Kelton Arms Condominium Ass’n v. Homestead Ins. Co., 346 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir.2003), controls. Kelton Arms holds that under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) the district court lacks authority to make a sua sponte remand to state court based on a non-jurisdictional defect in removal. Slip op. at 15035. Failure of all defendants to join in the notice of removal is a procedural defect. Parrino v. FHP, 146 F.3d 699, 703 (9th Cir.1998).
We therefore vacate the district court’s remand order and remand the case to district court for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 F. App'x 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-mci-worldcom-network-services-inc-ca9-2003.