Healy v. Hourigan
276 A.D.2d 1085
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 3, 1950
StatusPublished
This text of 276 A.D.2d 1085 (Healy v. Hourigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Healy v. Hourigan, 276 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).
Opinion
Ho opinion. Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Holán, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order, to deny the motion for summary judgment, and to vacate the judgment, on the ground that issues of fact are presented, and such issues should not be determined on affidavits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-hourigan-nyappdiv-1950.