Healy v. Foxcraft Philmont Division Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.

429 So. 2d 1368, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22446
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1983·No. No. 82-1048·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment entered pursuant to a jury veirdict upon a holding that (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing deposition testimony of a critical witness to be read to the jury, see Colonnades, Inc. v. Vance Baldwin, Inc., 318 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976); Fishman v. Liberty Associates, Inc., 196 So.2d 493 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), writ discharged, 205 So.2d 657 (Fla.1968), and (2) the trial court properly permitted the defendants to use videotapes made by the plaintiff’s expert during the course of cross-examination of the expert, see Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 120 Ariz. 328, 585 P.2d 1240 (1978).

We have examined the other issues presented and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Healy v. Foxcraft Philmont Division Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co., 429 So. 2d 1368, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22446 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

429 So. 2d 1368 (Healy v. Foxcraft Philmont Division Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fishman v. Liberty Associates, Inc.
196 So. 2d 493 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Colonnades, Inc. v. Vance Baldwin, Inc.
318 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
585 P.2d 1240 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1978)
Ferrell Jewelers of Tampa, Inc. v. Southern Mill Creek Products Co.
205 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)