Healy v. Dentcare Delivery System, Inc.
This text of 129 A.D.2d 557 (Healy v. Dentcare Delivery System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Isseks, J.), dated February 24, 1986, as granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents Dentcare Delivery Systems, Inc., Donovan and Feinberg.
In view of the fact that a pending action existed between the same parties for essentially the same relief and involving the same actionable wrong (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [4]; Siegel, NY Prac § 262), Special Term did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint herein. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Weinstein, Fiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.2d 557, 514 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healy-v-dentcare-delivery-system-inc-nyappdiv-1987.