Healy v. City of Wauchula

Supreme Court of Florida

Healy v. City of Wauchula

133 So. 345, 101 Fla. 160

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 7, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order. It is therefore considered ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the order. It is therefore considered ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Healy v. City of Wauchula, 133 So. 345, 101 Fla. 160 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

133 So. 345 (Healy v. City of Wauchula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.