Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.
This text of Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co. (Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
USAA General Indemnity Co., Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), dated May 13, 2014, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Per Curiam.
Order (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), dated May 13, 2014, reversed, with $10 costs, defendant's motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.
The defendant-insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing this first-party no-fault action should have been denied. While defendant submitted evidence showing that plaintiff's assignor misrepresented his military status in the underlying insurance policy application, defendant is precluded from asserting that defense as a result of its untimely denial of the claim (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v GMAC Ins. Co. Online, Inc., 80 AD3d 603 [2011]; Gutierrez v United Servs. Auto. Assn., 47 Misc 3d 152[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50797[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur
Decision Date: September 27, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Healthy Way Acupuncture, P.C. v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healthy-way-acupuncture-pc-v-usaa-gen-indem-co-nyappterm-2016.