HEALTH & HOSP. CORP. ETC. v. Marion County

476 N.E.2d 887, 1985 Ind. App. LEXIS 2328
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1985·No. 2-882A264·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

The Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing of our decision in Health and Hosp. Corp. v. Marion County (1984), Ind.App., 470 N.E.2d 1348, charges us with having erroneously applied the doctrine of implied contract against a county. While our supreme court has held that the doctrine of implied contract cannot be invoked against a county, it has approved and utilized the doctrine of quasi-contract, or contract implied in law, against such an entity. Thus, we properly applied the doctrine of quasi-contract in our opinion. See Board of Comm’rs v. Greensburg Times (1939), 215 Ind. 471, 19 N.E.2d 459.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

SULLIVAN and SHIELDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEALTH & HOSP. CORP. ETC. v. Marion County, 476 N.E.2d 887, 1985 Ind. App. LEXIS 2328 (Ind. Ct. App. 1985).

476 N.E.2d 887 (HEALTH & HOSP. CORP. ETC. v. Marion County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.E.D. v. Grant County Department of Welfare
582 N.E.2d 886 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1991)
Bayh v. Sonnenburg
573 N.E.2d 398 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1991)
Cohn v. Dept. of Professional Regulation
477 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)