Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. Alberto Carvalho

127 F.4th 750
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2025
Docket22-55908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 F.4th 750 (Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. Alberto Carvalho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. Alberto Carvalho, 127 F.4th 750 (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 4 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, No. 22-55908 INC., a Wyoming Not-for-Profit Corporation; JEFFREY FUENTES; D.C. No. SANDRA GARCIA; HOVHANNES 2:21-cv-08688-DSF-PVC SAPONGHIAN; NORMA BRAMBILA; Central District of California, CALIFORNIA EDUCATORS FOR Los Angeles MEDICAL FREEDOM, ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ALBERTO CARVALHO, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Los Angeles United School District; ILEANA DAVALOS, in her official capacity as Chief Human Resources Officer for the Los Angeles School District; GEORGE MCKENNA; MONICA GARCIA; SCOTT SCHMERELSON; NICK MELVOIN; JACKIE GOLDBERG; KELLY GONEZ; TANYA ORTIZ FRANKLIN, in their official capacities as members of the Los Angeles Unified School District governing board,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c) and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F.4th 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/health-freedom-defense-fund-inc-v-alberto-carvalho-ca9-2025.