Healey v. Maracaibo

79 F. 998
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided July 1, 1896·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the record as it stands we are inclined to agree with the district judge as to what took place before the consul, whose deposition seems not to have been taken. The facts being thus found against the claimants, it is unnecessary to discuss any of the propositions of law advanced upon the argument. The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Healey v. Maracaibo, 79 F. 998 (2d Cir. 1896).

79 F. 998 (Healey v. Maracaibo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.