Healey v. Maracaibo
79 F. 998
This text of 79 F. 998 (Healey v. Maracaibo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Healey v. Maracaibo, 79 F. 998 (2d Cir. 1896).
Opinion
Upon the record as it stands we are inclined to agree with the district judge as to what took place before the consul, whose deposition seems not to have been taken. The facts being thus found against the claimants, it is unnecessary to discuss any of the propositions of law advanced upon the argument. The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
79 F. 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healey-v-maracaibo-ca2-1896.