Healey v. All-Inn Trucking, Inc.

205 A.D.2d 359, 613 N.Y.S.2d 593

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered June 1, 1993, which granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant-appellant’s affirmative defense of workers’ compensation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As the IAS Court held, where the Workers’ Compensation Board finds injuries to be outside the purview of the Workers’ Compensation Law, an employer who participated in the hearing before the Board cannot assert the affirmative defense of compensation coverage in an ensuing civil action (Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 NY2d 15, 21). Appellant’s proper venue of [360]*360redress is an administrative appeal of the Board’s decision, not this civil action (cf., Werner v State of New York, 53 NY2d 346, 352, n 2). Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Healey v. All-Inn Trucking, Inc., 205 A.D.2d 359, 613 N.Y.S.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 359 (Healey v. All-Inn Trucking, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Werner v. State of New York
424 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.
496 N.E.2d 851 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)