Healer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Healer v. State

1913 OK CR 233, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 224

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 28, 1913

DocketNo. A-1670.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 233 (Healer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Healer v. State, 1913 OK CR 233, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 224 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jack Healer, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the crime of unlawfully selling whisky and was, on December 1st, 1911, in accordance with the. verdict of the jury, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of two ■hundred fifty, dollars. From this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on March 30th, 1912, a petition in .error with case-made. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that said appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute, in that no order was made extending the time beyond the sixty days allowed by law in which to perfect an appeal. For this reason the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the cause remanded to the county court of Washington county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jack Healer, plaintiff in error, was convicted of the crime of unlawfully selling whisky and was, on December 1st, 1911, in accordance with the. verdict of the jury, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for sixty days and to pay a fine of two ■hundred fifty, dollars. From this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on March 30th, 1912, a petition in .error with case-made. When the cause was called for final submission the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that said appeal was not taken within the time prescribed by the statute, in that no order was made extending the time beyond the sixty days allowed by law in which to perfect an appeal. For this reason the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the cause remanded to the county court of Washington county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 233, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 738, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.