Heald v. Wells

7 Wis. 149
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Wis. 149 (Heald v. Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heald v. Wells, 7 Wis. 149 (Wis. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court,

Cole, J.

The second point made by the counsel, for the respondent, on his brief, filed, disposes of this case. It does not appear, either from the printed case or the record sent up from the circuit court, that any exceptions were taken to the ruling of that court on the trial of the action; neither does it appear that the testimony taken before the commissioner was used at all on the trial. The record not showing what the evidence was, or that any exception was taken to it, the presumption is, that the circuit court rendered judgment upon sufficient and competent testimony. The party bringing up a case must show error in the court below, and under the code this applies as well to what was a chancery case under the old practice, as to what were known as common law actions. The judgment of the circuit court affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merwin v. Day
9 Wis. 156 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Wis. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heald-v-wells-wis-1859.