Heald v. Cushman

30 Me. 461
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Tenney, J. orally.

— The requirement that the value should be ascertained was inserted in the statute, merely to regulate the- cost. The plaintiff has made his own estimation, and not having requested instruction that the jury should pass upon the subject, he is bound by that estimation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heald v. Cushman, 30 Me. 461 (Me. 1849).

30 Me. 461 (Heald v. Cushman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Richards
1911 OK 214 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)