Heaffer v. New Era Life Insurance

101 Pa. 178, 1882 Pa. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 2, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Chief Justice Sharswood

delivered the opinion of the court, October 2d 1882.

The plaintiff had a clear right to show that he had complied with the condition of the policy in furnishing proofs of loss. Of the papers produced by the defendant, he had a right to offer such as he chose. He was not bound to offer all, certainly not such as he had not furnished himself. The judge committed a manifest error in refusing to receive some unless he offered all. This was an essential part of the plaintiff’s cause of action, and it was not incumbent on him, on it being ruled out, to go on and prove the remainder of liis case. It would have been an useless consumption of the public time.

Judgment reversed, and venire facias de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heaffer v. New Era Life Insurance, 101 Pa. 178, 1882 Pa. LEXIS 232 (Pa. 1882).

101 Pa. 178 (Heaffer v. New Era Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Siebelist v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
19 Pa. Super. 221 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)