Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck

524 N.E.2d 145, 71 N.Y.2d 927, 528 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 587
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 21, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 524 N.E.2d 145 (Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck, 524 N.E.2d 145, 71 N.Y.2d 927, 528 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 587 (N.Y. 1988).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that defendants are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jaffer v. Miles
524 N.E.2d 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 N.E.2d 145, 71 N.Y.2d 927, 528 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heady-electric-co-v-von-kerckerinck-ny-1988.