Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck
524 N.E.2d 145, 71 N.Y.2d 927, 528 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 587
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that defendants are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck, 524 N.E.2d 145, 71 N.Y.2d 927, 528 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 587 (N.Y. 1988).
524 N.E.2d 145 (Heady Electric Co. v. von Kerckerinck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jaffer v. Miles
524 N.E.2d 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)