Headrick v. State

237 So. 2d 555, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6184
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1970
DocketNos. 69-187, 69-186
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 237 So. 2d 555 (Headrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headrick v. State, 237 So. 2d 555, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellants Stanley A. Headrick and William T. Mims have taken separate appeals to this Court from the individual judgments and sentences entered against them. The two appeals have been heretofore consolidated in this Court for purpose of disposition.

Headrick and Mims were jointly charged by information filed in the Pinellas County Circuit Court with the offense of breaking and entering a store building known as Baldwin Jewelry Shop located at Indian Rocks Beach, with intent to commit grand larceny. Upon trial, they were found guilty by a jury of the offense charged. They were adjudged guilty and sentenced to a term of imprisonment.

On appeal to this Court, they make only one contention of error, viz: that the trial Judge unduly restricted the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors by the defendants’ counsel.

We have carefully examined the transcript of record with respect to such voir dire examination and find that the objection thereto taken by the defendants is without merit. The trial Judge imposed no restriction whatever upon any question directed to the qualifications as such of any prospective veniremen. It was only when counsel went too far, in the opinion of the Judge, in inquiring into the mental processes of the various jurors as to what their verdict would be in the event of some hypothetical or conjectural state of facts that the Judge restricted the examination. In this the Judge was rightfully exercising his broad discretion. No reversible error has been shown.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Headrick v. State
268 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Headrick v. State
240 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 So. 2d 555, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headrick-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.