Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co.
130 S.E.2d 809, 107 Ga. App. 561, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 906
Opinion
The contract in this case being substantially the same as that considered in W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Overstreet, 71 Ga. App. 873 (32 SE2d 574), we are bound by the [562] ruling there that the contract was one of suretyship. The overruling of defendants’ general demurrer is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co., 130 S.E.2d 809, 107 Ga. App. 561, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 906 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).
130 S.E.2d 809 (Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
National Acceptance Co. v. Fulton National Bank
148 S.E.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)