Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co.
130 S.E.2d 809, 107 Ga. App. 561, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 906
This text of 130 S.E.2d 809 (Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Headrick v. Furst-McNess Co., 130 S.E.2d 809, 107 Ga. App. 561, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 906 (Ga. Ct. App. 1963).
Opinion
The contract in this case being substantially the same as that considered in W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Overstreet, 71 Ga. App. 873 (32 SE2d 574), we are bound by the [562]*562ruling there that the contract was one of suretyship. The overruling of defendants’ general demurrer is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
National Acceptance Co. v. Fulton National Bank
148 S.E.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 S.E.2d 809, 107 Ga. App. 561, 1963 Ga. App. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headrick-v-furst-mcness-co-gactapp-1963.