Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.
Opinions
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
210 So. 2d 448 (Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.