Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.

210 So. 2d 448
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1968
DocketNo. 37062
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 So. 2d 448 (Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc., 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1968).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purkhiser v. State
210 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 So. 2d 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headrick-v-cypress-gardens-citrus-products-inc-fla-1968.