Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.

210 So. 2d 448
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 28, 1968·No. No. 37062·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date November 30, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fee filed by Petitioner is also denied.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc., 210 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1968).

210 So. 2d 448 (Headrick v. Cypress Gardens Citrus Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purkhiser v. State
210 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)